<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stat Traq 1.1.1 is closing in on 2,000 downloads.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tigerhawkblog.com/2007/03/22/stat-tarq-111-is-closing-in-on-2000-downloads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tigerhawkblog.com/2007/03/22/stat-tarq-111-is-closing-in-on-2000-downloads/</link>
	<description>Live life to the fullest.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:58:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingo</title>
		<link>http://www.tigerhawkblog.com/2007/03/22/stat-tarq-111-is-closing-in-on-2000-downloads/comment-page-1/#comment-3729</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefunzone.awardspace.com/wordpress/?p=95#comment-3729</guid>
		<description>Hi,

customers of mine were using stattraq for their sites, and recently run into problems, which usually has to be solved by me :)

i just did a quick look and the problem is quite easy and as follows:

From a certain level of hits stored in the database, stattraq will run into the php memory_limit, fastest way to reach that is ofcourse the year-summary for good visited sites. The Memory Limit on that Server were 64M - but even 80M were not enough - and offcourse raising the memory_limit would fix that problem only for some time, as soon enough, you will fall over it again.

Both stattraq tables in the db, dumped to plain-mysql-dump, were together 19M in size (almost no options in the option table).

i wouldn&#039;t go into your scripts as i have a lot other things to do, but i suggest you take a look at this matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>customers of mine were using stattraq for their sites, and recently run into problems, which usually has to be solved by me <img src='http://www.tigerhawkblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>i just did a quick look and the problem is quite easy and as follows:</p>
<p>From a certain level of hits stored in the database, stattraq will run into the php memory_limit, fastest way to reach that is ofcourse the year-summary for good visited sites. The Memory Limit on that Server were 64M &#8211; but even 80M were not enough &#8211; and offcourse raising the memory_limit would fix that problem only for some time, as soon enough, you will fall over it again.</p>
<p>Both stattraq tables in the db, dumped to plain-mysql-dump, were together 19M in size (almost no options in the option table).</p>
<p>i wouldn&#8217;t go into your scripts as i have a lot other things to do, but i suggest you take a look at this matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fips</title>
		<link>http://www.tigerhawkblog.com/2007/03/22/stat-tarq-111-is-closing-in-on-2000-downloads/comment-page-1/#comment-2121</link>
		<dc:creator>Fips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefunzone.awardspace.com/wordpress/?p=95#comment-2121</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on the popularity of your plugin - it seems since you wrote this post you can add another thousand to that number! Works great, looking forward to seeing what&#039;s in store for the next version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on the popularity of your plugin &#8211; it seems since you wrote this post you can add another thousand to that number! Works great, looking forward to seeing what&#8217;s in store for the next version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
